Skip to content
Vector

For asset and property managers

The second leak is a different problem from the first.

A green roof or podium that has leaked more than once has a contractor, a landlord, tenants and possibly an insurer who no longer agree on what is wrong. Independent location evidence ends that; a monitored roof stops it starting again.

Talk to Vector

By Ben Hickman, Technical Director  ·  8 October 2026  ·  Updated 8 October 2026
Contributing author, CIRIA C817 (Blue Roofs) · contributing committee member, BS 8102:2022 revision

Your situation

The roof above an occupied asset has leaked again. A repair was done; it may or may not have been in the right place; nobody can prove either way. The occupants anticipate water every time it rains. The contractor says the roof is sound, the landlord says it is not, the service charge is in dispute, and the insurer or warranty provider wants evidence before it will engage.

Vector is independent of the roofing contractor, the membrane manufacturer and the sensor manufacturers. We locate the defect through the build-up without stripping the roof, put it on a plan, witness the opening-up and the repair, and verify the result. The output is a report that all parties can rely on, rather than another opinion.

Why the arguments happen

Water travels sideways through a green roof build-up, often ten to fifty metres and sometimes a floor or two down, before it shows. So the stain is not under the defect, the contractor who opened up above the stain found sound membrane and said so truthfully, and the leak carried on. Patch repairs made before cause was established are often in the wrong place and are frequently poorly executed; nobody can say afterwards whether they worked. Every round makes the history harder to reconstruct and the relationship worse.

The way out is to establish cause before anyone repairs anything else, and to have the repair witnessed and verified by someone with no stake in the outcome.

The part that is usually yours to organise

The location survey needs the roof to be leaking while it is measured. The leak is recreated by watering the deck with leak diverters in place below. Where the party responsible for keeping the roof watertight is not the occupant, and especially where there are several occupants under the roof, that takes liaison, clear communication and written permission from everyone affected. It is often the biggest practical task of the exercise and the one most worth starting on the day the leak appears. We can give you the guidance and the equipment list; the permissions are yours.

What you receive

  • A desktop review first, telling you whether a through-build-up survey is viable for this roof before anything is quoted
  • A report, typically two weeks after two days on site, with a contour map of leak locations and suspicious areas on the roof plan
  • A call to agree the localised opening-up, typically a minimum of about a square metre per location
  • Attendance on exposure to confirm the defect and witness the repair, so that landlord, contractor, membrane supplier and occupants all get the same certainty
  • A report usable by a latent defect insurer or warranty provider; location evidence of this kind has been relied on by an expert witness in a legal case

Making it the last time

When the repair is being done and the build-up suits it, retrofitting a moisture sensor is straightforward and not particularly expensive. The win is confidence: with an intermittent leak, the loss of confidence is the real cost, and the constant anxiety of occupants, landlord and agent is what a sensor removes. The next time water reaches the deck the system says which zone, with a date and time, and the question of whose defect it is has an answer before it becomes an argument.

A roof that keeps coming back?

Send the roof plan, the ingress history and who sits under it. We will tell you whether a survey is viable before we quote.

Talk to Vector